José Carlos Pinto de Faria v. Prevent TWB do Brasil et al.
TJ San Paulo · Dec 1, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TJ San Paulo
- Record ID
- jose-carlos-pinto-de-faria-v-prevent-twb-do-brasil-et-al-2025-12-01
- Observed outcome
- Monetary Fine; Bar Referral
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney reproduced an ementa/precedent at fl. 6 that the court could not locate; number was incomplete (marked by repeated 'x'); court concluded it was an AI-generated, nonexistent precedent and not a real decision. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The court found that the agravante (through his counsel) reproduced a 'precedent' ementa that does not correspond to any real judgment and contained an incomplete case number (marked with repeated 'x'), concluding it was likely an AI 'alucinação' (fabricated citation) resulting from misuse of an intelligence‑assistance tool. The majority treated this as litigância de má-fé and imposed a fine of 2% of the updated value of the cause and ordered a copy sent to OAB/SP; a dissenting judge would have excused the attorney for lack of dolo and declined to impose the fine.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ San Paulo. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Bar Referral
- Bankruptcy
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Monetary Fine; Bar Referral
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.