Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-13QCAG0Generated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Kim Elizabeth Harwell v. WestCare Nevada, Inc.

D. Nevada · Mar 6, 2026

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
D. Nevada
Record ID
kim-elizabeth-harwell-v-westcare-nevada-inc-2026-03-06
Observed outcome
The court issued a warning to the plaintiff regarding the use of AI-generated fake citations and granted leave to amend the complaint.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court issued a formal warning to the pro se plaintiff regarding the inclusion of a fabricated case citation in her complaint, which the court attributed to the use of generative AI. The court reminded the parties of their obligations under FRCP 11(b)(2) to verify the accuracy of all cited authorities.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Estate of Saila v. Circle K Corp.' in support of negligence; court could not find the case and noted the citation numbers corresponded to unrelated cases.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Tort
  • Trial
  • Warning
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
generative AI software
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Order granting in part defendants' motion to dismiss and granting plaintiff leave to amend complaint.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court stated the plaintiff appeared to use generative AI software.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.