Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0GYO7VTGenerated October 21, 2026Evidence checked Oct 20, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

King v. AT&T Corp. et al.

W.D. Washington · Oct 13, 2026

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
W.D. Washington
Record ID
king-v-at-t-corp-et-al-2026-10-13
Observed outcome
Certification requirement in communication with opposing counsel
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | King cited a nonexistent district-court decision, then substituted a real Ninth Circuit decision that did not support the proposition asserted. Outcome: Certification requirement in communication with opposing counsel. Order to Show Cause is here.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Certification requirement in communication with opposing counsel. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Certification requirement in communication with opposing counsel in W.D. Washington. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Other
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Certification requirement in communication with opposing counsel
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.