Kosel Equity v. McGregor
SC Connecticut · Feb 19, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- SC Connecticut
- Record ID
- kosel-equity-v-mcgregor-2026-02-19
- Observed outcome
- Allowed to refile brief
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law Outcome: Allowed to refile brief. Hallucinations introduced during formatting of legal brief; counsel explained what happened here.
Fabricated: Case Law
ChatGPT-assisted formatting still requires a full cite-check pass before any brief is filed.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- ChatGPT
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Allowed to refile brief
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Metadata Only (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.