Lakhanpal v. Avis Budget Group Inc.
HRT Ontario · Jun 4, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- HRT Ontario
- Record ID
- lakhanpal-v-avis-budget-group-inc-2025-06-04
- Observed outcome
- The application was dismissed for being filed outside the statutory limitation period.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Tribunal dismissed the application as untimely, finding that the applicant failed to establish a good faith reason for the delay. The adjudicator explicitly disregarded three cited cases because they do not exist, concluding they provided no valid precedent for the applicant's position.
The Tribunal found the evidence inadequate to establish due diligence.
The decision excludes defective authority and resolves timeliness on the actual evidence.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Tribunal conducted a hearing in writing to determine its jurisdiction over an application filed after the one-year limitation period.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The source identifies the submission of fabricated cases, which is a common indicator of AI hallucination.
No AI tool or standalone citation sanction is identified.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify tribunal cases in the tribunal database.
- Support a delay explanation with evidence.
- Do not infer a tool where none is named.