Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-06JA5E8Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

McNeal v. United Food and Commercial Workers Local 555; Safeway, Inc.

D. Oregon · Jan 22, 2026

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
D. Oregon
Record ID
mcneal-v-united-food-and-commercial-workers-local-555-safeway-inc-2026-01-22
Observed outcome
The court issued a formal warning to the pro se plaintiff regarding the use of fabricated legal authority.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court issued a formal warning to the pro se plaintiff regarding the citation of a fabricated case, noting it was likely generated by AI. The court reminded the plaintiff of the obligation under Rule 11 to verify the existence and validity of all legal authorities cited in court filings.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent appellate decision 'Frey v. [ODOC], 204 P.3d 135 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)'; opposing counsel flagged the citation and the court explicitly warned the plaintiff that the opinion appears fabricated and may have been generated by AI.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: Warning.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Employment
  • Trial
  • Warning
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Opinion and Order on Defendants' motions to dismiss the plaintiff's second amended complaint.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court noted the citation may have been created by a generative AI tool.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.