M.H. v. C.S.
CA Indiana · Nov 24, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA Indiana
- Record ID
- mh-v-cs-2025-11-24
- Observed outcome
- The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, rejecting the appellant's claims of procedural error and bias.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Indiana Court of Appeals identified that the pro se appellant cited a non-existent case in her appellate brief. The court admonished the appellant for failing to comply with appellate rules requiring support by valid legal authority, though it proceeded to decide the case on its merits.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant's brief cited a case that the court determined does not exist; the court noted non-existent and irrelevant case law cannot support her contentions.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Indiana, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Other
- Appellate
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a trial court's denial of protective order petitions and grant of a protective order against the appellant.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.