Miller v. Colorado Department of Revenue
D. Colorado · Sep 30, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Colorado
- Record ID
- miller-v-colorado-department-of-revenue-2026-09-30
- Observed outcome
- Order to Show Cause
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Hurley v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co., 2011 WL 1103376 (S.D. Cal. 2011).” The court could not locate that case or citation; the Westlaw citation led to Cohen v. Federal Express Corp., and the similar real Hurley case was from the W.D. Mich. The court also found that the available Hurley orders did not support Plaintiff’s quoted proposition concerning SCRA coverage of interest and similar charges. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Order to Show Cause. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to Show Cause in D. Colorado. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Administrative
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order to Show Cause
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.