Nicholas Evan Nesbitt v. Trans Union, LLC, et al.
W.D. Arkansas · Aug 11, 2026
Short answer. Status: Filing restriction: the Clerk is directed to accept no further filings from Plaintiff without court approval, plus a warning that further frivolous filings will bring further sanctions up to termination of the case; amount: no amount stated. W.D. Arkansas, decision date on record August 11, 2026. As of November 14, 2026. Court source · Methodology
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Court
- W.D. Arkansas
- Record ID
- nicholas-evan-nesbitt-v-trans-union-llc-et-al-2026-08-11
- Observed outcome
- Filing restriction: the Clerk is directed to accept no further filings from Plaintiff without court approval, plus a warning that further frivolous filings will bring further sanctions up to termination of the case
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found at least two of Plaintiff's motions contained citations to nonexistent case law; Plaintiff admitted reliance on AI for legal research. Outcome: Filing restriction: the Clerk is directed to accept no further filings from Plaintiff without court approval, plus a warning that further frivolous filings will bring further sanctions up to termination of the case.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Filing restriction: the Clerk is directed to accept no further filings from Plaintiff without court approval, plus a warning that further frivolous filings will bring further sanctions up to termination of the case. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Filing restriction: the Clerk is directed to accept no further filings from Plaintiff without court approval, plus a warning that further frivolous filings will bring further sanctions up to termination of the case in W.D. Arkansas. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Other
- Trial
- Warning
- Non Monetary
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Filing restriction: the Clerk is directed to accept no further filings from Plaintiff without court approval, plus a warning that further frivolous filings will bring further sanctions up to termination of the case
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.