OLG Celle, 5 U 1/25
OLG Celle · Apr 29, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- OLG Celle
- Record ID
- olg-celle-5-u-1-25-2025-04-29
- Observed outcome
- The court identified the cited authorities as unverifiable 'Fehlzitate' and declined to rely on them; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited an OLG München decision (12.11.2015, 23 U 2003/15, NJW-RR 2016, 328); court found the citation unverifiable in juris and beck-online and treated it as a Fehlzitat. Outcome: The court identified the cited authorities as unverifiable 'Fehlzitate' and declined to rely on them; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed.. The defendant's briefs contained multiple case citations that the court determined were 'Fehlzitate' (unverifiable) because they could not be found in juris or beck-online under the given parameters. The court flagged these fabricated citations, refused to rely on them, and based its legal assessment on other verified authorities and the parties' factual pleadings. No professional sanctions or fines were imposed.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records The court identified the cited authorities as unverifiable 'Fehlzitate' and declined to rely on them; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with The court identified the cited authorities as unverifiable 'Fehlzitate' and declined to rely on them; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed. in OLG Celle. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court identified the cited authorities as unverifiable 'Fehlzitate' and declined to rely on them; no professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.