Oluronke Briana Adusei v. Colleen Auer, et al.
D. Arizona · Jan 20, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Arizona
- Record ID
- oluronke-briana-adusei-v-colleen-auer-et-al-2026-01-20
- Observed outcome
- The court granted motions to dismiss several counts with prejudice, dismissed others without prejudice, and issued a formal warning regarding the use of fabricated citations.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court issued a formal warning to the pro se plaintiff regarding the inclusion of fabricated legal citations in her filings. The court explicitly cautioned that citing non-existent or misleading authorities is not excused by pro se status and may lead to case-terminating sanctions in future proceedings.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on a cited authority 'Blessinger v. DPS' in support of a Title VI argument; the Court stated it was unable to locate the case and deemed the citation erroneous. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Ryan v. Cty. of Maricopa' in support of her reading of A.R.S. § 41-1463; the Court stated it was unable to locate the case and treated the citation as erroneous.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Arizona, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Tax
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order on Motions to Dismiss; claims dismissed with and without prejudice with leave to amend.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.