Ordinanza n. 11431
Cassazione · Feb 27, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Cassazione
- Record ID
- ordinanza-n-11431-2026-02-27
- Observed outcome
- The appeal was declared inadmissible, and the appellant was ordered to pay 3,000 EUR to the Cassa delle Ammende.
- Known monetary consequence
- €3,000
Why this matter warrants attention
The Italian Supreme Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible and imposed a 3,000 EUR fine on the appellant. The Court explicitly attributed the inclusion of non-existent legal principles and misidentified case law to the likely use of generative AI by the defense counsel.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Sez. VI, n. 41738/2018 and attributed a principle it does not contain; Court notes it was actually pronounced by Sez. II and lacks the claimed principle. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Sez. VI, n. 44901/2019 but misidentified the issuing section and attributed a principle the decision does not state; Court notes it was actually pronounced by Sez. VII and does not contain the claimed principle. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Sez. VI, n. 36091/2017 with an attributed principle the decision does not contain; Court notes the decision was actually pronounced by Sez. IV and lacks the claimed principle. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Sez. IV, n. 19756/2019 and attributed a principle it does not contain; Court notes it was actually pronounced by Sez. V and does not support the petition's claim. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Sez. II, n. 14792/2021 but misattributed the issuing section and principle; Court notes it was actually pronounced by Sez. VII and does not contain the attributed principle. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant attributed a principle to Sez. U, Mannino, n. 33748/2005 that the decision does not assert; Court notes the decision exists but not as the petition claims.
This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in Cassazione, with the listed outcome: Monetary Fine.
Failure modes and consequences
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Explicitly Recorded
- Recorded tool
- generative AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- €3,000
- Procedural posture
- The case reached the Supreme Court of Cassation as an appeal against a conviction by the Court of Appeal of Rome. The Supreme Court declared the appeal inadmissible.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The Court attributed the errors to the use of generative AI.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.