Ordinanza n. 789-1/2025 RGAC
C.A. Messina · Jan 9, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- C.A. Messina
- Record ID
- ordinanza-n-789-1-2025-rgac-2026-01-09
- Observed outcome
- The court rejected the appellant's request to suspend the provisional execution of the first-instance judgment.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The appellant alleged that the trial judge engaged in 'copy-paste' judicial writing by reproducing content from an online article and citing erroneous case law. The appellate court did not adjudicate the truth of these allegations, instead denying the appellant's request for a stay of execution because the underlying merits required further review.
Misrepresented: Doctrinal Work | Alleged verbatim reproduction of substantial passages from an IUSLETTER article titled "Il contratto parla chiaro: sei un coobbligato" (16.12.2024) in the first-instance judgment; appellant contended judge copied text without autonomous reasoning. || Misrepresented: Case Law | First-instance judgment cited a Corte d'Appello di Venezia decision as "Sent. n. 2065/2023 del 19.10.2023" for co-obligation doctrine; appellant's check found the named decision exists but with a different date (5 June 2025) and different subject-matter. || Misrepresented: Case Law | First-instance judgment invoked Cass. civ. n. 1548/2023 on the concept of dolo; appellant contended that that Supreme Court decision is inconferent to the matter addressed by the trial judge.
This record documents a Judge filing issue in C.A. Messina, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Hallucination_of_case_law
- Misrepresentation_of_authority
- Lack_of_autonomous_reasoning
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Interlocutory proceeding regarding a request for suspension of provisional execution (inibitoria) pending appeal.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The appellant alleged the judge copied text from an online article, implying the use of an unspecified AI or digital tool.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.