Pamela Blair v. Sanctuary Bluff Homeowners Association, Inc., et al.
CA Kentucky · Mar 20, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA Kentucky
- Record ID
- pamela-blair-v-sanctuary-bluff-homeowners-association-inc-et-al-2026-03-20
- Observed outcome
- The court struck the appellant's brief and ordered a refiling with an AI-free certification; the underlying dismissals of the appellant's claims were affirmed.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Kentucky Court of Appeals struck the appellant's brief after she admitted to using AI to draft filings that contained nine hallucinated citations and persistent misinterpretations of precedent. The court required the appellant to refile with a certification that the brief was prepared without AI assistance.
The court determined that the appellant's use of AI resulted in the inclusion of nine hallucinated cases and persistent misquoting of precedent, which violated procedural standards and hindered the court's ability to review the merits of the appeal.
This case illustrates the procedural consequences for pro se litigants who rely on AI tools to generate legal arguments without verifying the existence or accuracy of cited authorities, resulting in the striking of filings.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Contract
- Appellate
- Struck Filing
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of multiple consolidated circuit court orders dismissing claims for lack of prosecution and granting summary judgment in a foreclosure action.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court opinion refers to the use of artificial intelligence without naming a specific platform.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Implement mandatory verification protocols for all case law citations generated by AI tools.
- Require explicit certification of non-AI drafting or human-in-the-loop review for all appellate filings.
- Conduct independent research to confirm the existence and precedential weight of every authority cited in a brief.