Penland v. United States
Court of Federal Claims · Jul 7, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- Court of Federal Claims
- Record ID
- penland-v-united-states-2026-07-07
- Observed outcome
- Monetary Fine; Adverse Costs Order
- Known monetary consequence
- $5,000
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel stated that no authority held that the deeds conveyed the railroad’s fee-simple title and called the government’s position frivolous. The court found the statement false because McCotter held that a materially similar railroad deed conveyed an unqualified fee-simple estate, and Bevirt reached the same conclusion for materially similar source deeds. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Adverse Costs Order.
The structured public record identifies misrepresented authority and civil rights and records Monetary Fine; Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects misrepresented authority and civil rights with Monetary Fine; Adverse Costs Order in Court of Federal Claims. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Misrepresented Authority
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- $5,000
- Procedural posture
- Monetary Fine; Adverse Costs Order
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.