Pennmark Coventry Holdings, LLC v. Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc.
E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- E.D. Pennsylvania
- Record ID
- pennmark-coventry-holdings-llc-v-kohl-s-department-stores-inc-2026-09-09
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed to Kannankeril the proposition that the classic Daubert factors are not applicable to experience-based testimony. The Court found no such quoted language and explained that Kannankeril instead held that the factors are non-exhaustive and may not apply in every case, while still requiring analysis of reliability, sources, and methods.
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in E.D. Pennsylvania. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Contract
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.