Puerto Rico Soccer League NFP, Corp., et al. v. Federación Puertorriqueña de Futbol, et al.
D. Puerto Rico · Sep 23, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Puerto Rico
- Record ID
- puerto-rico-soccer-league-nfp-corp-et-al-v-federación-puertorriqueña-de-futbol-e
- Observed outcome
- Order to pay opposing counsel's fees
- Known monetary consequence
- $24,492
Why this matter warrants attention
False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed to Kevlik that MR 3.7(a)(3) substantial hardship exemption is interpreted broadly to protect against “unnecessary disruption”; court found no mention of MR 3.7 in Kevlik. Outcome: Order to pay opposing counsel's fees. In the Order, the court stated: "A simple Google search would have shown the problems in some of Plaintiffs’ citations. In other instances, a quick search of the opinion Plaintiffs cited to would have revealed problems.…
The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to pay opposing counsel's fees; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
When a show-cause response contains MORE hallucinated cites, courts escalate — treat the first AI-error finding as an emergency, not a formality.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Disqualification
- Contract
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- $24,492
- Procedural posture
- Order to pay opposing counsel's fees
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Limited (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Escalate unresolved verification failures before filing and preserve the responsible reviewer's signoff record.