Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1S423S8Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Rajabi c. Lassalle

TAL Montréal · Nov 1, 2024

Jurisdiction
international
Court
TAL Montréal
Record ID
rajabi-c-lassalle-2024-11-01
Observed outcome
The Tribunal authorized the repossession of the dwelling effective February 1, 2025, and ordered the landlords to pay the tenant a $3,000 indemnity.
Known monetary consequence
CA$3,000
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The Tribunal administratif du logement authorized the landlords' repossession request after finding the tenant's cited legal authorities were untraceable. The court did not impose sanctions for the citations, nor did it explicitly attribute the untraceable references to AI, though the case is tracked for the presence of hallucinated legal citations in a pro se filing.

Why the decision-maker cared

The tribunal applied the statutory repossession test to the parties’ evidence; the untraceable references did not substitute for that analysis.

Why it matters now

This primary decision contains untraceable authorities in a fact-driven housing dispute without an AI finding.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Administrative
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
CA$3,000
Procedural posture
Adjudicated repossession application heard by the Tribunal administratif du logement on October 9, 2024, with a final decision issued on November 1, 2024.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The source identifies the citations as untraceable, implying potential AI involvement without explicit confirmation.

The tribunal called two references untraceable; it did not call them AI-generated.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify CanLII identifiers and abbreviations.
  2. Do not let citations replace factual credibility evidence.
  3. Avoid labeling an error AI-generated without a source basis.