Rasko v. ICBC
BC CRT · Jan 30, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- BC CRT
- Record ID
- rasko-v-icbc-2026-01-30
- Observed outcome
- The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's claims for damages and refused to resolve the coverage dispute due to lack of jurisdiction.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Tribunal identified that the applicant cited a non-existent case, 'Brown v. Swanson, 2021 BCSC 698,' during her argument regarding shared liability in a rear-end collision. The decision-maker explicitly noted the citation error and confirmed the case did not exist, though the applicant's claim was ultimately dismissed on the merits of the evidence.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited 'Brown v. Swanson, 2021 BCSC 698' for the proposition that a sudden unnecessary stop can share fault; Tribunal found the case does not exist and that ICBC had raised the issue.
Opposing parties now routinely flag AI hallucinations; expect adversarial cite-checks on every submission.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Tort
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Small claims adjudication before the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) resulting in a final decision dismissing the applicant's claims.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.