Ravi Kadiyala v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al.
N.D. Illinois · Feb 6, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- N.D. Illinois
- Record ID
- ravi-kadiyala-v-shellpoint-mortgage-servicing-et-al-2026-02-06
- Observed outcome
- The court issued a warning regarding the use of AI and the duty of candor in filings, while granting the defendant's motion to dismiss.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court issued a formal warning to a pro se litigant after identifying a fabricated case citation in his filing. The judge explicitly inferred the use of an AI tool based on the citation's format and non-existence, cautioning the plaintiff that future filings must comply with Rule 11 obligations regarding factual and legal accuracy.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's filing cited a non-existent opinion; the court found the citation did not exist, inferred AI use, and warned of possible Rule 11 sanctions.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Illinois, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Contract
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss and denying Plaintiff's motion to remand.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court inferred the use of an AI tool based on the motion's format.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.