Re Sriram (aka Roy)
High Court · Oct 22, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- High Court
- Record ID
- re-sriram-aka-roy-2025-10-22
- Observed outcome
- The court dismissed the applicant's applications for disclosure and injunctions and granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Pantera Property Limited.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court identified that the pro se litigant relied on fabricated case law, specifically a non-existent citation. The judge attributed these errors to the litigant's use of internet research tools rather than intentional misconduct, and consequently issued no formal sanction beyond dismissing the underlying applications as meritless.
The judge reasoned that the applicant's reliance on fake authorities, such as 'Re Muir Hunter’s Trustee in Bankruptcy', stemmed from poor internet research practices rather than a deliberate attempt to mislead the court, noting the difficulty for laypersons to verify specialized insolvency reports.
Courts now assume invented citations come from AI, not research error — the excuse is gone.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Bankruptcy
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The matter involved two applications: one for disclosure and an injunction against the trustee in bankruptcy, and a second application by Pantera Property Limited to strike out the bankrupt’s claim against it. The court dismissed the applicant's motions and granted summary judgment for the defendant.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.