Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1Q0SAGHGenerated September 21, 2026Evidence checked Sep 21, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Registered Trustees of the Assemblies of God Gospel Church International (AGGCI) v Registrar of Societies and Others

High Court of Tanzania, Main Registry, Dodoma · Sep 3, 2026

Jurisdiction
international
Court
High Court of Tanzania, Main Registry, Dodoma
Record ID
registered-trustees-of-the-assemblies-of-god-gospel-church-international-aggci-v-registrar-2026-09-03
Observed outcome
The cited cases and quotations were expunged; counsel was suspended for six months and ordered to publish a written apology, with a further one-month suspension for noncompliance.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a purported Court of Appeal decision that the court could not locate. The cited Civil Appeal No. 27 of 1999 was not found, and the quotation stating that leave is consumed by filing and cannot be resurrected after a case is struck out was treated as fabricated. Outcome: The cited cases and quotations were expunged; counsel was suspended for six months and ordered to publish a written apology, with a further one-month suspension for noncompliance.. Counsel Johnson Johannes Kachenje cited and quoted two purported Court of Appeal decisions that could not be located: Mwanza Restaurant Workers Co-operative Societies v Regional Commissioner of Mwanza, Civil Appeal No. 27 of 1999, and Sanai Murumbe and another v Managing Director, Serengeti Safari Lodges Limited, [1986] T.L.R. 45. The court found that the cases did not exist, that the quotations were consequently fabricated, and that counsel had misstated facts and law despite claiming the mistake was inadvertent and not in bad faith. The court expunged the authorities and quotations from the record, found professional misconduct, suspended counsel for six months, and ordered a public apology in English and Swahili.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records The cited cases and quotations were expunged; counsel was suspended for six months and ordered to publish a written apology, with a further one-month suspension for noncompliance.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with The cited cases and quotations were expunged; counsel was suspended for six months and ordered to publish a written apology, with a further one-month suspension for noncompliance. in High Court of Tanzania, Main Registry, Dodoma. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Trial
  • Professional
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
The cited cases and quotations were expunged; counsel was suspended for six months and ordered to publish a written apology, with a further one-month suspension for noncompliance.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
  3. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.