Ryan Adam Dixon v. MultiCare Health System (1)
W.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. Washington
- Record ID
- ryan-adam-dixon-v-multicare-health-system-1-2026-03-04
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Mazza v. Washoe Cnty.; the Court identified this as a non-existent case cited by the plaintiff. Outcome: Warning.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Mazza v. Washoe Cnty.; the Court identified this as a non-existent case cited by the plaintiff. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Shirley v. Precision Castparts Corp.; the Court identified this citation as non-existent. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bounds v. Smith to support a proposition; the Court found the case did not support the proposition offered. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Plaintiff relied on regulatory and plan citations that the Court noted do not exist as cited (plaintiff later characterized them as typographical errors). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Lumber Co.; the Court found the case did not support the proposition for which it was offered.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Contract
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Limited (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.