Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1MWW6TKGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Ryan Andrew Nelson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

S.D. Georgia · Oct 28, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
S.D. Georgia
Record ID
ryan-andrew-nelson-v-state-farm-fire-and-casualty-company-2025-10-28
Observed outcome
The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's bad faith and IIED claims, while the breach of contract claim remains pending.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court identified that the pro se plaintiff submitted briefs containing fabricated case citations. The plaintiff admitted to this conduct. Although the court dismissed the plaintiff's bad faith and IIED claims for failure to state a claim, it used the incident to admonish the plaintiff regarding the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b) for all future filings.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff filed briefs containing multiple citations to nonexistent cases; the court and defendant identified these as fabricated case citations and the Magistrate Judge noted Plaintiff admitted filing them.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Georgia, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Contract
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Unspecified
Recorded tool
Unidentified
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The source document does not identify a specific tool.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.