Ryan v. Perez
CA Florida (3d) · Sep 23, 2026
Short answer. Status: Warning: the court of appeals chose not to start a show-cause step given the unique circumstances and cautioned the appellant that any future failure to verify cited cases will be penalized (No. 3D25-1254, p. 4); amount: no amount stated. CA Florida (3d), decision date on record September 23, 2026. As of November 8, 2026. Court source · Methodology
- Jurisdiction
- State
- Court
- CA Florida (3d)
- Record ID
- ryan-v-perez-2026-09-23
- Observed outcome
- Warning: the court of appeals chose not to start a show-cause step given the unique circumstances and cautioned the appellant that any future failure to verify cited cases will be penalized (No. 3D25-1254, p. 4)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The initial brief contained at least ten nonexistent or miscited case citations, according to the appellee’s answer brief. The court found that the citations were inaccurate and that several did not support the legal propositions for which they were offered, but the opinion did not identify each citation individually. Outcome: Warning: the court of appeals chose not to start a show-cause step given the unique circumstances and cautioned the appellant that any future failure to verify cited cases will be penalized (No. 3D25-1254, p. 4).
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning: the court of appeals chose not to start a show-cause step given the unique circumstances and cautioned the appellant that any future failure to verify cited cases will be penalized (No. 3D25-1254, p. 4). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: the court of appeals chose not to start a show-cause step given the unique circumstances and cautioned the appellant that any future failure to verify cited cases will be penalized (No. 3D25-1254, p. 4) in CA Florida (3d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Family
- Appellate
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning: the court of appeals chose not to start a show-cause step given the unique circumstances and cautioned the appellant that any future failure to verify cited cases will be penalized (No. 3D25-1254, p. 4)
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.