Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0W3IB0AGenerated September 24, 2026Evidence checked Sep 24, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Ryan v. Perez

CA Florida (3d) · Sep 23, 2026

Jurisdiction
state
Court
CA Florida (3d)
Record ID
ryan-v-perez-2026-09-23
Observed outcome
Warning
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | The initial brief contained at least ten nonexistent or miscited case citations, according to the appellee’s answer brief. The court found that the citations were inaccurate and that several did not support the legal propositions for which they were offered, but the opinion did not identify each citation individually. Outcome: Warning.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in CA Florida (3d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Family
  • Appellate
  • Warning
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Warning
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.