Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0P4ORBRGenerated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Sanchez v. Chedraui USA, Inc.

California SC · Nov 6, 2025

Jurisdiction
state
Court
California SC
Record ID
sanchez-v-chedraui-usa-inc-2025-11-06
Observed outcome
The court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment and issued an Order to Show Cause regarding sanctions against plaintiff's counsel for a fabricated citation.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court issued an Order to Show Cause (OSC) against plaintiff's counsel for citing a case, "Briganti v. Chow King, Inc.," which the court could not locate and deemed likely fabricated. Counsel must file a declaration explaining the citation and appear at a hearing to address potential sanctions.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited a case the court could not locate — "Briganti v. Chow King, Inc. (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 776" — and the court treated it as a likely fabricated citation and issued an OSC for sanctions.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in California SC, with the listed outcome: Order to Show Cause.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Tort
  • Trial
  • Ordered To Show Cause
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Order to Show Cause issued following a motion for summary judgment.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court noted the citation was likely generated by AI tools.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.