Sehra Waheed v. SM 1 MMS, LLC, et al.
S.D. New York · Oct 28, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- S.D. New York
- Record ID
- sehra-waheed-v-sm-1-mms-llc-et-al-2025-10-28
- Observed outcome
- The court recommended that the plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief be denied.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court identified a likely AI-generated hallucination in a pro se filing, specifically a non-existent case citation. While the court noted this as a potential AI hallucination, it did not impose a formal sanction, instead using the observation to support its recommendation to deny the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Hughes v. Tennessee Department of Corrections, No. 3:20-cv-00670 (M.D. Tenn. June 11, 2021)'; the court was unable to locate the case in research databases and suggested it may be an AI-generated hallucination.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Contract
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Interim Payments.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.