Sexton v. Department of Homeless Services, et al.
S.D. New York · Sep 30, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- S.D. New York
- Record ID
- sexton-v-department-of-homeless-services-et-al-2026-09-30
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Davila v. Gutierrez for compelling identification of a John Doe defendant and permitting substitution. The Court found that no decision exists at 330 F. App’x 125 and that the actual Davila decisions do not address John Doe identification. Outcome: Warning.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in S.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.