Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-058BF5ZGenerated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Shakori v Tern, 2025 ONLTB 31233

LTB (Ontario) · May 26, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
LTB (Ontario)
Record ID
shakori-v-tern-2025-onltb-31233-2025-05-26
Observed outcome
The Board determined the Residential Tenancies Act applies to the tenancy effective October 13, 2024, after disregarding the tenant's AI-generated case law.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board rejected case law citations provided by a tenant after the tenant admitted they were generated by ChatGPT and were fictitious. The adjudicator disregarded the AI-generated content, noting it was not instructive, and decided the matter based on other evidence without imposing sanctions for the AI usage.

Why the decision-maker cared

The adjudicator took judicial notice that ChatGPT is known to create fictitious information and found the provided citations were never located, rendering them not instructive to the decision.

Why it matters now

Pro-se tenant's ChatGPT-sourced citations rejected as fictitious; admitted post-hearing but no sanction imposed.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Administrative
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Admitted
Recorded tool
ChatGPT
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Adjudicated order issued by the Landlord and Tenant Board (Ontario) following a hearing on April 15, 2025, to determine the applicability of the Residential Tenancies Act.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The tenant admitted using ChatGPT for case references.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence and accuracy of all legal citations through reliable, primary legal databases.
  2. Do not rely on generative AI tools for legal research or case law retrieval without independent verification.
  3. Be prepared to address the provenance of legal authorities if challenged by the opposing party or the tribunal.