South Central Ohio Job and Family Services v. Corey Mason
CA Ohio · Nov 25, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA Ohio
- Record ID
- south-central-ohio-job-and-family-services-v-corey-mason-2025-11-25
- Observed outcome
- The appellate court overruled the appellant's assignments of error and affirmed the trial court's judgment denying the motion to vacate.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court found that the pro se appellant's motion to vacate a civil protection order relied on multiple inaccurate or non-matching case citations. Specifically, the appellant misattributed '2016-Ohio-2987' to 'Nolan v. Nolan' instead of 'State v. Hari,' leading the court to reject the associated legal arguments.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited '2016-Ohio-2987' as Nolan v. Nolan; the court found that citation is misattributed and does not support the asserted legal proposition (2016-Ohio-2987 corresponds to State v. Hari). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Motion contained multiple inaccurate or non-matching case citations (court observed only 2 of 10 citations actually refer to the cases cited).
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Ohio, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Hallucinated_case_law
- Misrepresented_authority
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Other
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a trial court's denial of a motion to vacate a civil stalking protection order.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The record implies AI usage through the nature of the citation errors.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.