State ex rel. Soretha Marie Eldridge v. Judge Ashley Kilbane
CA Ohio · Oct 31, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA Ohio
- Record ID
- state-ex-rel-soretha-marie-eldridge-v-judge-ashley-kilbane-2025-10-31
- Observed outcome
- The court dismissed the writs of mandamus and prohibition and ordered the relator to pay costs.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court dismissed the relator's writs of mandamus and prohibition after she admitted to including hallucinated cases in her petition. The court denied her request for leave to amend the petition and ordered her to pay costs.
Fabricated: Case Law
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Ohio, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Civil Rights
- Appellate
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, granted the respondent's motion to dismiss the relator's petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court identified the source of the errors as artificial intelligence but did not name a specific tool.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.