State v. Garrett
CC Wisconsin · Feb 6, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CC Wisconsin
- Record ID
- state-v-garrett-2026-02-06
- Observed outcome
- Case dismissed without prejudice
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law Outcome: Case dismissed without prejudice. From the docket record: "Court sanctions DA Solis by striking the State's Response for failure to disclose AI, using hallucinated and false citations and for admitting failure to disclose AI. Court grants Motion to Dismiss for defective bind-over, in its entirety, without prejudice. "
Fabricated: Case Law
A prosecutor who hides AI use and files fake citations loses the case; mandate written AI disclosure on every criminal filing.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- Case Dismissed
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Case dismissed without prejudice
wcca.wicourts.gov
Official court or government source. The recorded link is hosted by a court or government domain.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Metadata Only (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Follow any applicable disclosure and attribution requirements for AI-assisted work.
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.