Tekla & Tekla
Federal Circuit and Family Court · Dec 23, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Federal Circuit and Family Court
- Record ID
- tekla-tekla-2025-12-23
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a non-existent case 'Dogan & Dogan' (said to be Family Court of Australia, 2004); court noted it does not exist and omitted it from reasons.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a non-existent case 'Dogan & Dogan' (said to be Family Court of Australia, 2004); court noted it does not exist and omitted it from reasons. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant relied on 'Duncan & Duncan' with a 2016 citation which does not exist; court identified it as a fabricated authority. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant relied on 'Tindal & Tindal' with a 2007 citation which does not exist; court identified it as fabricated. || False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a proposition to Penfold v Penfold that the case does not contain (claimed that costs orders should not impose undue hardship); court noted incorrect citation and misstatement of authority. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant misstated the House v The King test, describing legal unreasonableness as a test of 'fairness'; court identified this as an incorrect statement of the precedent. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Jurchenko & Foster [2014] FamCAFC 127 with an incorrect citation and relied on it to support family violence despite that case rejecting the claims; court noted the incorrect citation and misapplication.
Family appellate courts itemize each fabricated authority by name in reasons; mischaracterizations are published record.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Family
- Appellate
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.