Thompson v. County of San Diego
CA California (4d) · Jul 14, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA California (4d)
- Record ID
- thompson-v-county-of-san-diego-2026-07-14
- Observed outcome
- Counsel withdrew the unsupported quotations and citations
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel admitted that a quotation attributed to Stevens did not appear in the opinion and withdrew it after the Court identified the error. Outcome: Counsel withdrew the unsupported quotations and citations.
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Counsel withdrew the unsupported quotations and citations. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Counsel withdrew the unsupported quotations and citations in CA California (4d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Other
- Appellate
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- Lexis+ with Protégé
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Counsel withdrew the unsupported quotations and citations
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
Lexis+ with Protégé is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.