Unnamed Brazilian litigant
6th Civil Chamber, Court of Justice of Santa Catarina · Feb 18, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- 6th Civil Chamber, Court of Justice of Santa Catarina
- Record ID
- unnamed-brazilian-litigant-2025-02-18
- Observed outcome
- Appeal partially granted (reintegration suspended, rent imposed), but litigant sanctioned for bad-faith litigation; 10% fine on the updated value of the case; copy of filing sent to OAB-SC for disciplinary review
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Outcome: Appeal partially granted (reintegration suspended, rent imposed), but litigant sanctioned for bad-faith litigation; 10% fine on the updated value of the case; copy of filing sent to OAB-SC for disciplinary review.
The court emphasized that the legal profession is a public calling entailing duties and responsibilities. It cautioned that AI must be used “with caution and restraint”. The chamber unanimously supported the sanction
Brazilian appellate courts now send fabricated-citation filings to the OAB as bad-faith litigation — 'unintentional' ChatGPT use is no defense.
Failure modes and consequences
- Bar Referral
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- ChatGPT
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Appeal partially granted (reintegration suspended, rent imposed), but litigant sanctioned for bad-faith litigation; 10% fine on the updated value of the case; copy of filing sent to OAB-SC for disciplinary review
tjsc.jus.br
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Metadata Only (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Apply the same source-checking controls to ChatGPT output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.