Verduzco v. Con Agra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC
E.D. California · Sep 28, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- E.D. California
- Record ID
- verduzco-v-con-agra-foods-packaged-foods-llc-2026-09-28
- Observed outcome
- Reply Struck
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation about a vacated hearing making the reply deadline moot to Hoffman v. Constr. Protective Servs., Inc., but the court found that the cited case number, Westlaw citation, and quoted language did not correspond to the claimed decision; the court deemed the material possibly fabricated or an AI hallucination. Outcome: Reply Struck.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Reply Struck. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Reply Struck in E.D. California. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Employment
- Trial
- Struck Filing
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Reply Struck
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.