Veterans Review and Appeal Board Decision No. 100006353091
CA VRAB · Oct 15, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- International
- Court
- CA VRAB
- Record ID
- veterans-review-and-appeal-board-decision-no-100006353091-2026-10-15
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | The medical opinion attributed the article to Konijnenberg A and others and cited Occupational and Environmental Medicine, but the Panel identified the actual authors as Ea Helene Korsgaard Thorsen, Annett Dalbøge, Nicholas Hovgaard, Johan Hviid Andersen, and Alexander Jahn, and the actual journal as Annals of Work Exposures and Health. The Panel found that the Nurse Practitioner’s report bore the hallmarks of having been written by AI and not reviewed by the practitioner. Two cited scientific articles were attributed to incorrect authors and journals, and the opinion incorrectly stated that the condition was diagnosed within 25 years of release from service, despite the period exceeding 31 years. The Panel gave the opinion no weight, emphasizing that AI-generated references must be checked for accuracy, but granted the claim based on the Veteran’s service records, occupational activities, symptoms, and applicable eligibility guidelines.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA VRAB. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Administrative
- Appellate
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.