Wang v. Mongeon
HRT Ontario · Nov 19, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- HRT Ontario
- Record ID
- wang-v-mongeon-2025-11-19
- Observed outcome
- The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction due to judicial immunity. Additionally, the adjudicator identified that the applicant submitted three fabricated case citations, noting that these non-existent authorities raised concerns regarding the potential use of artificial intelligence in the applicant's research.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited "Wong v. Toronto (City), 2022 HRTO 987"; Tribunal found no such decision and that the citation number corresponds to a different case unrelated to the matter. || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited "Tan v. RBC, 2021 HRTO 432"; Tribunal determined this citation does not exist and the number relates to a different Tribunal decision. || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited "Chen v. Ontario (Justice of the Peace), 2020 HRTO 112"; Tribunal found no matching decision and noted the citation number is associated with a differently named matter.
Tribunals cross-check citation numbers against their own docket — invented HRTO numbers are exposed within one filing.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) regarding jurisdiction, received written submissions from the applicant, and subsequently dismissed the application.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.