White v. The Owners, Strata Plan BCS3946
BC CRT · Feb 27, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- BC CRT
- Record ID
- white-v-the-owners-strata-plan-bcs3946-2026-02-27
- Observed outcome
- The applicants' claim was dismissed in its entirety, and the strata's chargeback was upheld.
- Known monetary consequence
- CA$2,500
Why this matter warrants attention
The tribunal dismissed the applicants' claim, finding the strata's chargeback for the insurance deductible was valid under its bylaws. The tribunal identified that the applicants submitted likely AI-generated hallucinations, including fabricated legal citations and non-existent statutory provisions, which the tribunal declined to address.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Applicants' submissions included multiple incorrect or inapplicable CRT case citations; tribunal found these were likely AI-generated and did not address arguments with no legal basis. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Applicants repeatedly cited a subsection of the Strata Property Act that does not exist; tribunal identified this as a likely hallucination.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in BC CRT, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Contract
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- CA$2,500
- Procedural posture
- Final decision by the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) dismissing the applicants' claim.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
Tribunal identified likely AI-generated hallucinations.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.