Wurm v. Anchor Bay Packaging Corporation
E.D. Mich. · Sep 4, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- E.D. Mich.
- Record ID
- wurm-v-anchor-bay-packaging-corporation-2026-09-04
- Observed outcome
- Plaintiff’s motions were stricken or denied; the case was stayed, and Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why sanctions or contempt should not be imposed. No sanction for an AI hallucination was imposed in this order.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Outcome: Plaintiff’s motions were stricken or denied; the case was stayed, and Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why sanctions or contempt should not be imposed. No sanction for an AI hallucination was imposed in this order.. The Court found that Plaintiff’s motions had the earmarks of being generated by AI and warned that generative AI can produce nonexistent cases and misstatements of law. However, the order did not identify any particular hallucinated citation, false quotation, or misrepresented precedent in Plaintiff’s filings. The motions were stricken or denied primarily for violating local rules, lacking a proper signature, and disregarding the Court’s prior orders. The Court stayed the case and ordered Plaintiff to show cause regarding possible sanctions or contempt.
The structured public record identifies pro se and trial and records Plaintiff’s motions were stricken or denied; the case was stayed, and Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why sanctions or contempt should not be imposed. No sanction for an AI hallucination was imposed in this order.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and trial with Plaintiff’s motions were stricken or denied; the case was stayed, and Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why sanctions or contempt should not be imposed. No sanction for an AI hallucination was imposed in this order. in E.D. Mich.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Plaintiff’s motions were stricken or denied; the case was stayed, and Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why sanctions or contempt should not be imposed. No sanction for an AI hallucination was imposed in this order.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.