2028604 Ontario Ltd. v. His Majesty the King
Tax Court of Canada · Oct 28, 2026
Short answer. Status: Warning; amount: no amount stated. Tax Court of Canada, decision date on record October 28, 2026. As of November 13, 2026. Court source · Methodology
- Jurisdiction
- International
- Court
- Tax Court of Canada
- Record ID
- 2028604-ontario-ltd-v-his-majesty-the-king-2026-10-28
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Case Law | The appellant attributed propositions concerning representation under section 17.1(1.1) to paragraphs 14, 16, and 18 of Masa Sushi Japanese Restaurant v. The Queen, but the Court found that those paragraphs did not support the asserted propositions. The decision also predated the statutory amendment creating the relevant leave authority. Outcome: Warning.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Warning in Tax Court of Canada. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Tax
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.