Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 13, 2026 · Latest decision Nov 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCases2028604 Ontario Ltd. v. His Majesty the King
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

2028604 Ontario Ltd. v. His Majesty the King

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Courtready; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

Tax Court of Canada · Oct 28, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | The appellant attributed propositions concerning representation under section 17.1(1.1) to paragraphs 14, 16, and 18 of Masa Sushi Japanese Restaurant v. The Queen, but the Court found that those paragraphs did not support the asserted propositions. The decision also predated the statutory amendment creating the relevant leave authority. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Warning in Tax Court of Canada. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | The appellant attributed propositions concerning representation under section 17.1(1.1) to paragraphs 14, 16, and 18 of Masa Sushi Japanese Restaurant v. The Queen, but the Court found that those paragraphs did not support the asserted propositions. The decision also predated the statutory amendment creating the relevant leave authority. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Warning in Tax Court of Canada. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTax Court of Canada
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateOct 28, 2026
First seenNov 13, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | The appellant attributed propositions concerning representation under section 17.1(1.1) to paragraphs 14, 16, and 18 of Masa Sushi Japanese Restaurant v. The Queen, but the Court found that those paragraphs did not support the asserted propositions. The decision also predated the statutory amendment creating the relevant leave authority.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | The written representations referred to “Robson Enterprises” without any citation information, leaving the authority unverifiable. The reference was deleted from the amended representations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in 2028604 Ontario Ltd. v. His Majesty the King?
Misrepresented: Case Law | The appellant attributed propositions concerning representation under section 17.1(1.1) to paragraphs 14, 16, and 18 of Masa Sushi Japanese Restaurant v. The Queen, but the Court found that those paragraphs did not support the asserted propositions. The decision also predated the statutory amendment creating the relevant leave authority. Outcome: Warning.
Why does 2028604 Ontario Ltd. v. His Majesty the King matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Warning in Tax Court of Canada. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about 2028604 Ontario Ltd. v. His Majesty the King?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this 2028604 Ontario Ltd. v. His Majesty the King summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.