Agravo de Instrumento nº 5059805-76.2025.8.24.0000
TJ San Catarina · Sep 16, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TJ San Catarina
- Record ID
- agravo-de-instrumento-no-5059805-76-2025-8-24-0000-2025-09-16
- Observed outcome
- Monetary Fine
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited several non-existent STJ and state-court precedents (process numbers that do not correspond to real decisions); court found these authorities fabricated. Outcome: Monetary Fine. The relator identified that the appellant-lawyer cited multiple jurisprudential authorities and a doctrinal passage that do not exist or do not contain the quoted text. The court concluded these were fabricated or misattributed authorities — likely produced by indiscriminate use of AI — and held the behavior amounted to litigância de má-fé (breach of duties in arts. 77 and 80 CPC). As sanction for the hallucinated/fictitious citations the court imposed a monetary penalty for litigância de má-fé and rejected the agravo interno. The opinion stresses the duty of candor and caution when using AI and the need to verify authorities.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Fine. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Fine in TJ San Catarina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Other
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Monetary Fine
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.