Nº 5043726-22.2025.8.24.0000/SC
TJ San Catarina · Aug 12, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney credited Min. Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino with a formulation tied to REsp 1.792.145/SP; court determined the reference and quoted text do not exist for that matter in the repository. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ San Catarina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney credited Min. Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino with a formulation tied to REsp 1.792.145/SP; court determined the reference and quoted text do not exist for that matter in the repository. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ San Catarina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Monetary Fine; Bar Referral
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney credited Min. Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino with a formulation tied to REsp 1.792.145/SP; court determined the reference and quoted text do not exist for that matter in the repository.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney attributed to Min. Raul Araújo a decision (AgInt no AREsp 1.456.789/SP) supporting non-application of preclusion under protest; court found the cited process and quote fictitious.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney cited a supposed TJRJ decision 'AI 0012345-67.2024.8.19.0000' holding that payment under protest does not create preclusion; court found the process number does not correspond to any real decision.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney cited a supposed TJMG decision 'AI 1.0000.24.123456-7/001' stating payment under protest is not acquiescence; court found the process number and decision to be nonexistent.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney attributed to Min. Nancy Andrighi a quoted holding cited as REsp 1.721.697/SP (DJe 15/05/2018); court found no such quotation or supporting precedent in STJ records.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Nº 5043726-22.2025.8.24.0000/SC?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Attorney credited Min. Paulo de Tarso Sanseverino with a formulation tied to REsp 1.792.145/SP; court determined the reference and quoted text do not exist for that matter in the repository. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
- Why does Nº 5043726-22.2025.8.24.0000/SC matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ San Catarina. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Nº 5043726-22.2025.8.24.0000/SC?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Nº 5043726-22.2025.8.24.0000/SC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.