Ali Jabbari v. Parviz Omidvar, et al.
C.D. California · Aug 3, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- C.D. California
- Record ID
- ali-jabbari-v-parviz-omidvar-et-al-2026-08-03
- Observed outcome
- Order to Show Cause
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's filings contained fabricated and unsubstantiated legal authorities and non‑existent case citations; court identified these AI‑hallucinated case law citations as unreliable. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Order to Show Cause. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to Show Cause in C.D. California. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Tort
- Trial
- Ordered To Show Cause
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order to Show Cause
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.