Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
C.D. California · Jul 2, 2026
CA / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityother
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., the C.D. California addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a pro se litigant filing. The linked source records that plaintiff withdrew several cited authorities that the Notice of Errata states do not exist. The recorded procedural consequence is Order to Show Cause. The entry is dated 2026-07-02. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding.
- Why the court cared
- The linked source identifies the filing problem as: Plaintiff withdrew several cited authorities that the Notice of Errata states do not exist..
- Why it matters now
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a federal proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Why this matter is tracked
In Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., the C.D. California addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a pro se litigant filing. The linked source records that plaintiff withdrew several cited authorities that the Notice of Errata states do not exist. The recorded procedural consequence is Order to Show Cause. The entry is dated 2026-07-02. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding.
Operational lesson
The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a federal proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Record details
CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtC.D. California
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateJul 2, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeOrder to Show Cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to Show Cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff withdrew several cited authorities that the Notice of Errata states do not exist.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff withdrew several existing authorities that, according to the Notice of Errata, do not support the propositions for which they were cited.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.?
- In Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., the C.D. California addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a pro se litigant filing. The linked source records that plaintiff withdrew several cited authorities that the Notice of Errata states do not exist. The recorded procedural consequence is Order to Show Cause. The entry is dated 2026-07-02. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding.
- Why does Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a federal proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
- What does the public record establish about Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.?
- Limited to the linked source and the documented citation or quotation issue and stated disposition; no unrecorded tool, motive, or broader litigation facts are inferred.
- Which source supports this Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.