Andrey Ivanov & Hometrade Realty Inc. Brokerage v. Uri Kiselman & Viva Solar Inc. (Costs Endorsement)
ON SCSM · Jan 29, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- ON SCSM
- Record ID
- andrey-ivanov-hometrade-realty-inc-brokerage-v-uri-kiselman-viva-solar-inc-costs-endorseme-2026-01-29
- Observed outcome
- The court found the submissions contained AI-like hallucinations and ordered the paralegal Ms. Derya Vural to personally pay $2,000 to opposing counsel in trust under Rule 19.06 and s.29 of the Courts of Justice Act.
- Known monetary consequence
- $1
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Sandler v. Goldstein, 2007 ONCA 153' as authority on commissions; no such case exists at that citation (2007 ONCA 153 is Re DeFilippis). Outcome: The court found the submissions contained AI-like hallucinations and ordered the paralegal Ms. Derya Vural to personally pay $2,000 to opposing counsel in trust under Rule 19.06 and s.29 of the Courts of Justice Act.. The paralegal for Ivanov filed written submissions citing multiple non-existent or mis-cited cases and a non-existent statutory section, conduct the Court identified as having all the hallmarks of AI-generated "hallucinations." The Court gave the paralegal an opportunity to show cause and to provide source material but she failed to do so. Relying on the Chief Justice's AI Practice Direction and applicable Small Claims rules, the Court concluded the conduct was misleading and imposed a $2,000 personal penalty on the paralegal under Rule 19.06 and s.29 of the Courts of Justice Act.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records The court found the submissions contained AI-like hallucinations and ordered the paralegal Ms. Derya Vural to personally pay $2,000 to opposing counsel in trust under Rule 19.06 and s.29 of the Courts of Justice Act.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with The court found the submissions contained AI-like hallucinations and ordered the paralegal Ms. Derya Vural to personally pay $2,000 to opposing counsel in trust under Rule 19.06 and s.29 of the Courts of Justice Act. in ON SCSM. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- $1
- Procedural posture
- The court found the submissions contained AI-like hallucinations and ordered the paralegal Ms. Derya Vural to personally pay $2,000 to opposing counsel in trust under Rule 19.06 and s.29 of the Courts of Justice Act.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.