Which source supports this AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLC summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesAndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLC

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLC

W.D. Missouri · Aug 25, 2026

MS / federal Editorial impact: medium pro se fake citations fabricated quotes misrepresented authority Ordered To Show Cause

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | November 18 filing (Doc. 53) included citations to nonexistent cases; AndDone moved for Rule 11 show cause. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Order to Show Cause. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to Show Cause in W.D. Missouri. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | November 18 filing (Doc. 53) included citations to nonexistent cases; AndDone moved for Rule 11 show cause. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to Show Cause in W.D. Missouri. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

MississippiSingle-state evidence scope

Explore MSOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtW.D. Missouri

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateAug 25, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | November 18 filing (Doc. 53) included citations to nonexistent cases; AndDone moved for Rule 11 show cause.
False Quotes: Case Law | November 18 filing contained quotations attributed to authority that the court found to be improper or unsupported.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Gaines inaccurately represented that the Bankruptcy Court 'expressly held' AndDone's claim was discharged, but the Bankruptcy Court made no such ruling (Doc. 53-3).

Questions this record answers

What happened in AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLC?: Fabricated: Case Law | November 18 filing (Doc. 53) included citations to nonexistent cases; AndDone moved for Rule 11 show cause. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Why does AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLC matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to Show Cause in W.D. Missouri. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLC?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLC summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Euphoric, LLC et al. v. Westport Community Improvement District, et al. (2)W.D. Missouri · Jun 22, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Euphoric, LLC et al. v. Westport Community Improvement District, et al.W.D. Missouri · Jun 3, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority Joshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank (2)N.D. Mississippi · May 7, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Theoda E. Mills, Jr. v. City of St. Louis, et al.E.D. Missouri · Jan 30, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Desmond Cunningham v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al.N.D. Mississippi · Jan 7, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Latasha Hill v. Auto Club Family Insurance CompanyS.D. Mississippi · Sep 17, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 27, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 27, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open W.D. Missouri profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology