Asif v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2026] FedCFamC2G 1402
FedCFamC2G (Division 2) · Jul 22, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- FedCFamC2G (Division 2)
- Record ID
- asif-v-minister-for-immigration-and-citizenship-2026-fedcfamc2g-1402-2026-07-22
- Observed outcome
- Application dismissed; Applicant ordered to pay First Respondent's costs of 9,097.93; Court criticised AI-generated submissions and noted possibility of above-scale costs due to AI hallucinations.
- Known monetary consequence
- $1
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | ChatGPT produced fabricated details relating to a 'No 3' judgment and admitted fabricating those details when interrogated by the Judge. Outcome: Application dismissed; Applicant ordered to pay First Respondent's costs of 9,097.93; Court criticised AI-generated submissions and noted possibility of above-scale costs due to AI hallucinations.. The self-represented Applicant admitted using ChatGPT to draft written submissions which contained hallucinated and incorrect authorities, paragraph references, and propositions. The Court identified fabricated details (including a ChatGPT-created account concerning a 'No 3' judgment) and multiple mis-citations/misrepresentations (eg. incorrect paragraph citation in Garikimukku, improper use of Inderjit and Patel citations). The Court criticised the AI-generated material, treated it as imposing an additional burden on the respondent and the Court, and ordered costs (with consideration of above-scale costs because of the AI usage).
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Application dismissed; Applicant ordered to pay First Respondent's costs of 9,097.93; Court criticised AI-generated submissions and noted possibility of above-scale costs due to AI hallucinations.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Application dismissed; Applicant ordered to pay First Respondent's costs of 9,097.93; Court criticised AI-generated submissions and noted possibility of above-scale costs due to AI hallucinations. in FedCFamC2G (Division 2). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- Monetary
- Case Dismissed
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- ChatGPT
- Known monetary consequence
- $1
- Procedural posture
- Application dismissed; Applicant ordered to pay First Respondent's costs of 9,097.93; Court criticised AI-generated submissions and noted possibility of above-scale costs due to AI hallucinations.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.